Introduction
Why functional safety matters in software systems
Understand functional safety risks
Apply ISO 26262 and ASIL levels
Implement safety-critical isolation using safety island architecture
Functional safety for automotive software development
How to use Data Distribution Service (DDS)
Deploy OpenAD Kit across multiple cloud instances
Run OpenAD Kit across distributed ROS 2 instances
Next Steps
In automotive systems, a non-safety ECU (Electronic Control Unit) typically runs non-critical tasks such as infotainment or navigation. A safety island, by contrast, is dedicated to executing safety-critical control logic (for example, braking and steering) with strong isolation, redundancy, and determinism.
The table below compares the characteristics of an ECU and a safety island in terms of their role in supporting functional safety.
Feature | ECU | Safety island |
---|---|---|
Purpose | Comfort/non-safety logic | Safety-critical decision making |
OS/runtime | Linux, Android | RTOS, hypervisor, or bare-metal |
Isolation | Soft partitioning | Hardware-enforced isolation |
Functional safety requirement | None to moderate | ISO 26262 ASIL-B to ASIL-D compliant |
Fault handling | Best-effort recovery | Deterministic safe-state response |
This comparison shows why safety-critical software depends on dedicated hardware domains to meet functional safety goals.
If the main processor fails or becomes inoperable, a safety island can take over critical safety functions such as deceleration, stopping, and fault handling to prevent catastrophic system failures.
Safety islands are often implemented as lockstep cores or separate MCUs that run on real-time operating systems (RTOS), offering guaranteed performance under fault conditions.
A safety island provides a dedicated environment for executing critical safety functions. Its key characteristics include:
Acting as an independent redundant safety layer
Supporting the ASIL-D safety level
Providing independent fault detection and recovery mechanisms:
Safety islands play a key role in enabling ISO 26262 compliance by isolating safety-critical logic from general-purpose processing. They’re a proven solution for improving system determinism, fault tolerance, and fallback behavior.